MP3 at 128kbps public listening test - OPEN

>>because it is faster (heh) and higher quality. I doubt the second statement very musch :) But the slow codec is extremely slow, I agree... :( >>FhG never implemented VBR on their slow codec either. Who cares ? :) >>Hope that answered your question Mostly, thanks ! BTW: It seems that later codecs were developed by Opticom, not Fhg inst. themselves. At least, Opticom stated it for a very long time, but some years ago this phrase disappeared from their advertisment... I think, only Ivan know the truth... :) :)

Thank you Roberto. I'm sorry you had so few tests in the mp3 test. I was one to blame for sure. :o But I promise to participate in the AAC test. :) :) :)

And MusicMatch jukebox encodeur for MP3 VBR ... ???

Last question ... In your 64 Kbps test it's WMA9 or WMA9 Pro? ... sorry